If you are having difficulty viewing this email, please click here.
Go Back


Compliance Framework Document


Enda Jordan
Director Corporate Tax Services
Over the past few years, the Revenue Commissioners have undergone a major restructuring. As part of this, they have established a ‘Large Case Division’ (LCD) to deal with the tax affairs of Ireland’s largest companies and wealthiest individuals.

When created, the intention was that the LCD would deal with approximately 300 of the largest corporate groups (with an annual turnover of over €127m) and 200 wealthy individuals (with assets in excess of €50m and an annual income of over €1.27m). In addition, the LCD includes a specific division to deal with the Financial Services Industry.

Following the selection of companies and individuals for the LCD, the Revenue sought initial meetings with the management of the chosen companies in order to outline the purpose of the LCD and its modus operandi. Indeed, most companies that have their affairs now dealt with by the LCD will have had some level of Revenue audit or contact in the last 12 months.

The Revenue indicated that one of the goals of the LCD was to encourage high tax compliance by these large companies and the Financial Services sector. As part of the LCD approach, the idea of agreeing a tax 'compliance framework' with companies was muted by the Revenue, indicating that companies which agreed such frameworks with them would benefit to the extent that the Revenue would intrude as little as possible on their businesses. In addition, the Revenue indicated that where interpretation of law was sought from the Revenue, the Revenue’s resources available for dealing with such queries would be biased in favour of taxpayers who agreed compliance frameworks.

In return, the Revenue will expect the taxpayer to agree with the Revenue as to what constitutes high compliance and what the taxpayer must do to achieve this. The taxpayer would also be expected to talk to the Revenue before engaging in an arrangement or structuring transactions that might be perceived as tax avoidance. As readers will appreciate, what the Revenue might interpret as tax avoidance might be regarded as prudent tax management by a business person.

Despite the early flurry, little has happened in relation to agreeing compliance framework documents with any individual companies. However, the matter has reactivated itself in the last few months and the Revenue now seems to be searching for appropriate ‘guinea pigs’. It is still unclear as to what exactly the Revenue will expect from taxpayers who agree to the framework document and, indeed, concerns have been raised about the appropriateness of such an approach by the Revenue at all. It is likely that before the next edition of this newsletter, more information will be available as to the benefits and burdens of an agreed compliance framework document and we will comment on the matter further at that time.

However, if any company is approached by the Revenue in relation to agreeing a compliance framework document, we recommend you contact your Ernst & Young Tax Partner to discuss the position.


 

 

If you have any feedback on any aspect of this publication we would be delighted to hear from you
email - tax.watch@ie.ey.com