Go Back

Pensions - Back to the Future

James Kavanagh
Senior Manager, Pensions - Dublin

The Government continues to be deeply concerned over the growing lack of pension coverage in Ireland. Upon appointment, the Minister for Social and Family Affairs requested an overall review of pension provision in Ireland to be brought forward to 2005. The reasoning behind this move? A reported 59% aged 30+ years being covered by a private pension scheme1 , coupled with only 55,011 Personal Retirement Savings Accounts (PRSAs) being effected to the end of June 20052 , means that the coverage target set by the Pensions Board of 66% by the end of 2005 (70% by 2008) is unlikely to be realised unless remedial action is taken.3 Given the long-term consequences for individuals, the Government’s concern is more than justified.

What can be done? It is imperative that the Department of Finance uses the provision of tax incentives as a tool to support any government action plan put forward. In this case, the right hand must support the left — anything else and our position will be compromised even further. Some of the courses of action include

  • No dilution of existing tax relief for pension contributions. Doing otherwise would have a negative impact for pension investors. Only the streamlining of various tax incentives, with a view to making pensions more accessible and less complicated, would be considered advantageous.

  • Allowing those on the basic rate of income tax to claim income tax relief on personal pension contributions at the higher rate, albeit subject to the age-related sliding scale, would assist the attractiveness of pensions to individuals.

  • Streamlining the tax relief benefits which are open to PRSA versus Retirement Annuity Contract (RAC) contributors, so that there is equality in how tax relief is granted.
  • Streamlining the pension options open to the self-employed, employer, Additional Voluntary Contribution (AVC) contributors and proprietary directors by means of the Approved Retirement Fund (ARF) options.
  • In the event that past ideas of the National Pensions Policy Initiative and Securing Retirement Income report are considered — for example, a cap on earnings that an employer can fund in Defined Benefit (DB) or Defined Contribution (DC) schemes, or on tax-free commutations — there should be sufficient 'grandfathering' provisions which do not detract from the good efforts one may have made in funding for one's retirement.
  • 6. Building on the success of the savings habit created by the SSIA by (a) allowing transfers to existing products without a tax penalty on interest earned; and (b) introducing a tax credit system whereby the Government would pay a certain percentage for every €1 contributed by the pension investor.

In conclusion, given the end goal is to increase the coverage of pensions in Ireland, Budget 2006 needs to instigate change in a positive manner. This means providing sufficient tax incentives to pension investors and employers so as to facilitate the recommendations in the National Pensions Review (2006).

 

1 Pensioners Incomes and Replacement Rates in 2000, G Hughes & D Watson. (May 2005).
2 PRSA figures for 2nd Quarter,2005 by the Pensions Board
3 Securing Retirement Income - Report of the Pensions Board to the Minister for Social, Community and Family Affairs (1998).
Review of Potential Options to Encourage Increased Pension Coverage, Indecon International Economic Consultants (March 2005)

For further information or advice on any of the topics included in Tax Watch please contact:
Cork ..... Frank O'Neill Partner   frank.oneill@ie.ey.com
Dublin   James Kavanagh Senior Manager   james.kavanagh@ie.ey.com
Galway   Sandra McDonald Senior Manager   sandra.mcdonald@ie.ey.com
Limerick   John Heffernan Regional Head of Tax   john.heffernan@ie.ey.com
Waterford   Paul Fleming Director   paul.fleming@ie.ey.com

 

 

 
 

 

If you have any feedback on any aspect of this publication we would be delighted to hear from you
email - tax.watch@ie.ey.com